Friday, 11 May 2012

Books I Borrowed...

There are a few books I've borrowed from friends and libraries which have now been returned, and so I'm going to give each one a paragraph or two, instead of a proper review.  Partly so I can include them on my Century of Books list, but partly because it's fun to do things differently sometimes.  Of course, it's entirely possible that I'll get carried away, and write far too much... well, here are the four books, in date order.  Apologies for the accidental misquotation in the sketch today... I only noticed afterwards!


Canon in Residence - V.L. Whitechurch (1904)
This was surprisingly brilliant. Rev. John Smith on a continental holiday encounters a stranger who tells him that he'd see more of human life if he adopted layman's clothes.  Smith thinks the advice somewhat silly, but has no choice - as, during the night, the stranger swaps their outfits.  Smith goes through the rest of his holiday in somewhat garish clothing, meeting one of those ebullient, witty girls with which Edwardian novels abound.  A letter arrives telling him that he has been made canon of a cathedral town - where this girl also lives (of course!)  He makes good his escape, and hopes she won't recognise him...

Once in his position as canon, Smith's new outlook on life leads to a somewhat socialist theology - improving housing for the poor, and other similar principles which are definitely Biblical, but not approved of by the gossiping, snobbish inhabitants of the Cathedral Close.  As a Christian and the son of a vicar, I found this novel fascinating (you can tell that Whitechurch was himself a vicar) but I don't think one would need to have faith to love this.  It's very funny as well as sensitive and thoughtful; John Smith is a very endearing hero.  It all felt very relevant for 2012.  And there's even a bit of a criminal court case towards the end.

Three Marriages - E.M. Delafield (1939)
Delafield collects together three novellas, each telling the tale of a courtship and marriage, showing how things change across years: they are set in 1857, 1897, and 1937.  Each deals with people who fall in love too late, once they (or their loved one) has already got married to somebody else.  The surrounding issues are all pertinent to their respective periods.  In 1897, and 'Girl-of-the-Period', Violet Cumberledge believes herself to be a New Woman who is entirely above anything so sentimental as emotional attachments - and, of course, realises too late that she is wrnog.  In 1937 ('We Meant To Be Happy') Cathleen Christmas marries the first man who asks, because she fears becoming one of so many 'surplus women' - only later she falls in love with the doctor.  But the most interesting story is the first - 'The Marriage of Rose Barlow'.  It's rather brilliant, and completely unexpected from the pen of Delafield.  Rose Barlow is very young when she is betrothed to her much older cousin - the opening line of the novel is, to paraphrase without a copy to hand, 'The night before her wedding, Rose Barlow put her dolls to bed as she always had done.'  Once married, they go off to India together.   If you know a lot more about the history of India than I do, then the date 1857 might have alerted you to the main event of the novella - the Sepoy Rebellion.  A fairly calm tale of unequal marriage becomes a very dramatic, even gory, narrative about trying to escape a massacre.  A million miles from what I'd expect from Delafield - but incredibly well written and compelling.

Miss Plum and Miss Penny - Dorothy Evelyn Smith (1959)
Miss Penny, a genteel spinster living with her cook/companion Ada, encounters Miss Plum in the act of (supposedly) attempting suicide in a duckpond.  Miss Penny 'rescues' Miss Plum and invites her into her home. (Pronouns are tricky; I assume you can work out what I mean.)  It looks rather as though Miss Plum might have her own devious motives for these actions... but I found the characters very inconsistent, and the plot rather scattergun.  There are three men circling these women, whose intentions and affections vary a fair bit; there are some terribly cringe-worthy, unrealistic scenes of a vicar trying to get closer to his teenage son. It was a fun read, and not badly written, but Dorothy Evelyn Smith doesn't seem to have put much effort into organising narrative arcs or creating any sort of continuity.  But diverting enough, and certainly worth an uncritical read.

The Shooting Party - Isabel Colegate (1980)
Oh dear.  Like a lot of people, I suspect, I rushed out to borrow a copy of The Shooting Party after reading Rachel's incredibly enthusiastic review.  Go and check it out for details of the premise and plot.  I shall just say that, sadly, I found it rather ho-hum... perhaps even a little boring.  The characters all seemed too similar to me, and I didn't much care what happened.  Even though it's a short novel, it dragged for me, and the climax was, erm, anti-climactic.  Perhaps my expectations were too high, or perhaps my tolerance for historical novels (albeit looking back only sixty or seventy years) is too low.  Sorry, Rachel!

15 comments:

  1. I'd love to get to the Delafield and Smith books. I just got to the Diary of a Provincial Lady by mere chance and loved it. Hopefully the others will get discovered too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So pleased that you managed to find Provincial Lady! I think this is one of those cases where the most famous book *is* the best one; the PL is wonderful.

      Delete
  2. I really want to read 'Miss Plum and Miss Penny' initially just for the title alone but the premise sounds brilliant. Is it wrong I chuckled at the idea of suicide in a duck pond, oh dear!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Surely you were on the edge of your seat worrying about Elfrida Beetle, Simon!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ha! No, I rather assumed she would be ok...

      Delete
  4. I'm with Rachel on the Shooting Party I'm afraid - I read this several years ago and thought it was fantastic. I think I then went through one of those phases of being a "Shooting Party Bore"! telling anybody who would listen (or as was more likely anyone trapped and unable to get away from me!!) how wonderful this book was! I loved the kind of "Grand-Edwardian-Last-Stand" feel that the book had and the tragedy in the contrast between the events in the novel and what was about to befall them and so many millions of others. Hadn't heard of Canon In Residence but sounds good so will add to my "To Look Out For List!"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm very glad that you loved it! I wish I had... but I'll settled for vicarious enjoyment on this one :)

      Delete
  5. Rats, I'm jealous! I wanted to read Canon in Residence but couldn't get a copy , so I made do with another of Whitechurch's books, which I suspect isn't nearly as much fun. I'll have to keep looking for it, but in the meantime I must do one of these round-up posts, as the list of "Century" books read but not reviewed is getting silly. The reading part is very entertaining, though.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oo, how did you hear of it? I never had until it was lent to me. Now I want to get my own copy...
      A round-up post is a great way to bump up my ACOB tally, and only feels a *little* like cheating!

      Delete
  6. It's years since I read The Shooting Party, but from what little I remember I think I'm in your camp, Simon. Rachel did make me wonder if I should try it again ... but maybe not.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And I felt all alone in my camp! Thanks for making me feel a little less of a pariah, Mary :)

      Delete
  7. I'm with you on The Shooting Party. On the strength of Rachel's review I borrowed this from my local library and was totally under-whelmed. A first time disappointment from reviews via your blog though so no hard feelings:-)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ah, more people in my camp! Well, I'm sorry we had a disappointing reading experience - but I am rather glad that I'm not all on my own!

      Delete
  8. Canon in Residence sounds most intriguing! I wonder whether the UL holds it - will have to check. You do wonderfully well at finding E M Delafield titles, and Richmal Crompton ones (I am hoping to get a copy of the novel you mentioned here a couple of days ago). I never find them in my travels, ever! Sorry you didn't like The Shooting Party. I remember now I was going to suggest Wallace Stegner's Crossing to Safety as a late-80s read, but I do so in fear and trembling as it may not be your sort of thing. I think Wallace Stegner is an amazing writer, though.

    ReplyDelete

Thanks so much for taking the time to comment - my favourite part of blogging is reading your comments!

Annoyingly, Blogger often messes up with comments... try refreshing, or commenting Anonymously (add your name in, though!) or using Firefox/Chrome instead of Internet Explorer. (Ctrl+c your comment first!)

Failing everything, email me: simondavidthomas[at]yahoo.co.uk - or just email me anyway :)

Thanks!